Legal Opinion

Banks v. Birmingham Board of Education

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided September 26, 2019No. 2:12-cv-01682Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION ELEAZIER BANKS, et al., } } Plaintiffs, } } v. } Case No.: 2:12-cv-01682-MHH } BIRMINGHAM BOARD OF } EDUCATION, } } Defendant. } ORDER The named and opt-in plaintiffs in this Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) action seek overtime wages that they allege the defendant, the Birmingham Board of Education, did not pay them when they worked more than 40 hours in a workweek. The Court certified an opt-in class that consists of “all classified non- exempt employees who have worked at the Board’s 49 schools during the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richardson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  2. Arthur v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  3. Mays v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Rossi v. Troy State UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2002
  5. Wallace v. HolderDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API