Legal Opinion

Singh v. Zuidema

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1995PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground of forum non conveniens (see, CPLR 327) was improperly denied. Balancing the interests and conveniences of the parties and the court, we conclude that the action could be better adjudicated in another forum (see, Varkonyi v S. A. Empresa De Viacao Airea Rio Grandense [Varig], 22 NY2d 333, 337-338). Plaintiffs and one defendant are residents of the Province of Ontario and the other defendant is an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Varkonyi v. S. A. Empresa De Viacao Airea Rio GrandenseNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Martin v. MiethNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bodea v. TransNat Express, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Rothluebbers v. ObeeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Mensah v. MoxleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Dales v. TiessenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Lischinskaya v. Carnival Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API