Legal Opinion

Dales v. Tiessen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 27, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground of forum non conveniens (see, CPLR 327). We agree. Both parties are residents of the Province of Ontario, as are plaintiffs treating physician and an eyewitness to the car accident. "The only connection with New York is 'the adventitious circumstance that the accident occurred here’ (Martin v Mieth, 35 NY2d 414, 418) * * * t, which] fact alone does not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. MiethNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Singh v. ZuidemaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Singh v. SwanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shelton v. Cable Express, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. EMSLIE, JAMES v. RECREATIVE INDUSTRIES, INC.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Emslie v. Recreative Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Emslie v. Recreative Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API