Central Trust Co. v. Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri
In Equity. On exceptions to master’s report. In re intervening petition of St. Louis, Keokuk & Northwestern Railroad Company.
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The question which arises on the intervening claim of the St. Louis, Keokuk & Northwestern Railroad against the receivers of the Wabash Railway Company must be determined with reference to the provisions of a contract entered into on February 4, 1879, between the St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railroad as party of the first part, and the intervenor as party of the second part. That contract recited “that the intervenor desired to complete its line of railway from Clarks-ville, Missouri, to a connection with the railway of the first party at or near Dardenne, now St. Peters, and form a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chicago v. SheldonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Robinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cook v. FoleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Metropolitan Nat. Bank v. Benedict Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Krebs Hop Co. v. LivesleyOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Chicago G. W. Ry. Co. v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Lowery v. WestheimerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.