Legal Opinion

Katleman v. Katleman

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1958No. 4097PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from order of the court below denying the motion of appellant, as the wife in an action for divorce, for allowances and alimony pendente lite under NRS 125.040. The matter is before us on the motion of the respondent husband to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the order in question is not an appealable order under Rule 72 (b) NRCP.

This proposition has been well established in this state. Engebretson v. Engebretson, 73 Nev. 19, 307 P.2d 115; Harrison v. Harrison, 54 Nev. 369, 17 P.2d 693; Kapp v. Kapp, 31 Nev. 70, 99 P. 1077, 21 Ann.…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kapp v. KappNevada Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Wilkinson v. WilkinsonNevada Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Engebretson v. EngebretsonNevada Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Harrison v. HarrisonNevada Supreme Court · 1933

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gumm v. MainorNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hopper v. HopperNevada Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API