Legal Opinion
Doucette v. City of Santa Monica
District Court, C.D. California
Decided February 6, 1997No. Civil Action 95-1136PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
KELLER, District Judge.
Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Adjudication brought by plaintiffs Len Dou-cette (“Doucette”), Donna Mendez, Cortland Bonds, Bonny Ann Dodd, Carol Roe, and John Doe. The motion is opposed by defendants City of Santa Monica (the “City”) and its Chief of Police James T. Butts, Jr. (“Butts”). In the underlying action, plaintiffs allege civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. section 1983. Plaintiffs now move for summary adjudication of their sixth claim, which challenges the constitutionality of certain ordinances regulating…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- L.A. All. for Survival v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Comite De Jornaleros De Redondo Beach v. City of Redondo BeachDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
- Berger v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Los Angeles Alliance for Survival v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Western States Medical Center v. ShalalaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.