Legal Opinion
Barnett v. Marquis
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 17, 2014No. 3:13-cv-01588-HZPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
HERNANDEZ, District Judge:
Steven M. Barnett brings five claims against Clatsop County District Attorney Joshua Marquis and Clatsop County Chief Deputy Attorney Ronald Brown, alleging Defendants violated his First Amendment free speech rights and Fourteenth Amendment due process rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 First Am. Compl., ¶ 1. Plaintiffs first claim alleges Defendants violated his Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process right to employment. Id. ¶ 28. Plaintiffs second claim alleges Defendants retaliated against him in violation of his First Amendment free speech…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Buckley v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Franklin Savage v. State of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Krile v. LawyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Krile v. LawyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Collins v. AutoZone, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2024