Legal Opinion
United States v. Sather
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided February 26, 2001No. CIV 99-1031PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KORNMANN, District Judge.
FACTS
[¶ 1] Arthur G. Sather (“Sather”) and others borrowed money from what is now the Farm Service Agency (“FSA”). Sather executed or assumed certain promissory notes.(1)A note for $116,000.00 (No. 43-04) was executed on December 28, 1976, and rescheduled on January 4, 1984, with a maturity date of January 4, 1991. Annual payments were required beginning January 1, 1985. Sather made no payments.(2) A note for $200,000.00 (No. 43-02) was executed on December 28, 1976. The term was for 20 years and the note would have matured on…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Jane Donaho v. Fmc Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, as Plan Administrator of the Fmc Long-Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Breeden v. Erie Islands Resort & Marina (In re Bennett Funding Group, Inc.)District Court, N.D. New York · 2003