Legal Opinion

Little v. Dominion Transmission, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided September 30, 2015No. Civil Action No. 5:14-cv-00060PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELIZABETH K. DILLON, District Judge.

Defendant Dominion Transmission, Inc., a natural gas company, wants to build a new pipeline through Virginia. The proposed route runs across property owned by plaintiffs William W. Little, II, and Wendy M. Little. To determine whether the property is suitable for the project, Dominion intends to enter and conduct a survey, in accordance with Virginia Code § 56-49.01. Seeking to prevent Dominion from entering the property, the Littles filed this action, alleging that Dominion’s entry would be a trespass, and that § 56-49.01 is…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Klemic v. Dominion Transmission, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2015
  2. Atlantic Coast Pipeline, L.L.C. v. WadsworthAugusta County Circuit Court · 2015
  3. Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. GlickDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2025
  4. Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. HinzDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2025
  5. NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE v. THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONSDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API