Nichols v. Levy
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court 1
72 U.S. 433 (____)
5 Wall. 433
NICHOLS
v.
LEVY.
Supreme Court of United States.
Messrs. Carlisle and McPherson, for J.B. and J. Nichol, appellants.
Messrs. Bradley and Wilson, contra.
2Opinion of the Court · SwayneJustice Swayne
If the determination of this case depended upon the general principles of jurisprudence, the result must necessarily be in favor of the appellees. It is a settled rule of law that the beneficial interest of the cestui que trust, whatever it may be, is liable for the payment of his debts. It cannot be so fenced about by inhibitions and restrictions as to secure to it the inconsistent characteristics of right and…
3Cited by35 opinions
- Potter v. CouchSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Jourolmon v. MassengillTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
- Spindle v. ShreveSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Camden & Suburban Railway Co. v. StetsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Raynolds v. HannaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1893
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.