Legal Opinion

Stokes v. Reliance Insurance Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided October 28, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Judge.

This is a declaratory judgment action to require Reliance Insurance Company [Reliance] to defend Matthew Stokes [Stokes] and provide liability protection with respect to a suit brought against Stokes by James W. Brooks [Brooks] for injuries received in an automobile collision in which Stokes was the driver and Brooks was a passenger in a car which had been rented from Allstate Auto Leasing Company t/a National Car Rental [Allstate]. At all times pertinent to this case an automobile liability insurance policy issued by Reliance was in effect with respect to Allstate’s rental car.

P…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Landis Ex Rel. Talley v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AbramowiczSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
  3. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ShellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Farm Bureau Automobile Insurance v. MartinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Clarendon National InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  2. Jeanes v. Nationwide Insurance Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1987
  3. Snow v. WebbSuperior Court of Delaware · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API