Legal Opinion
Farm Bureau Automobile Insurance v. Martin
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 4, 1951No. 4056PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, C. J.
It is not disputed that the operation of the Hudson sedan by the defendant Louis R. Martin was with the permission of the named insured. Accordingly, there was coverage so far as definition of the insured is concerned.
It is also undisputed that the accident happened during the six months period for which the policy was written and that the policy had not been cancelled prior to the accident.
The plaintiff claims that the policy had lapsed as applied to the operation of the Hudson sedan prior to the accident on May 27, 1949, because of the failure of Arnold W. Martin to notify the plaintiff of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Century Indemnity Co. v. SimonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1948
3Cited by31 opinions
- Edgar T. Weekes v. Atlantic National Ins. Co., California State Auto Association v. Atlantic National Ins. Co., Atlantic National Ins. Co. v. California State Auto AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Hawkeye-Security Ins. Co. v. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Kennedy v. Audubon Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
- McCann for Use of Osterman v. Continental Cas. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1955
- Birch v. Harbor Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.