Legal Opinion
University of Maryland at Baltimore v. Peat, Marwick, Main & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 22, 1993No. 91-1889PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.
When Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland Insurance Company went into statutory rehabilitation, it triggered various insolvency proceedings and- suits in state and federal courts, and satellite litigation concerning the conduct of some attorneys in the proceedings. The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania dealt primarily with Mutual Fire’s insolvency. While that was progressing, four individually named plaintiffs filed a class action in federal district court against Peat, Marwick, Main & Company, alleging that Peat Marwick performed materially deficient…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Donovan v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Clarence E. Bennett v. Kenneth Berg, Dan R. Sandford, Jr. v. Kenneth BergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Tal v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Bancoklahoma Mortgage Corp. v. Capital Title Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. UrbanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- United States v. Louis Parise, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.