People v. Smink
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, Acting P. J.
Each of the defendants herein was accused under a separate information filed by the district attorney of Riverside County of the commission of a felony, to wit, violation of section 288a of the Penal Code, committed as set forth in the respective informations. There was also a third defendant who has not appealed. Each information was filed on February 7, 1930. Each defendant was separately arraigned in the Superior Court of Riverside County on the same day, February 7, 1930. The record shows that each defendant was furnished with a copy of the information. With reference to representation by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. SchwarzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- People v. ManriquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. BosticCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- People v. FuskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- People v. WeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. CastanedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. FabricantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- People v. TidwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Pueblo v. MéndezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.