Legal Opinion
Wong v. McCandless
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided January 15, 1931No. 1971PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT BY
BANKS, J.
This is an action for damages resulting from an automobile accident. The circuit court, trying the case without a jury, decided that the plaintiff was entitled to recover of the defendant the sum of $4000 and entered judgment accordingly. The case is here on exceptions.
The following facts were established by the undisputed evidence: The defendant was awarded a contract by the sewer and water commission of Honolulu for the construction of certain public works and improvements known as “Kapalama Interceptor.” In doing the work involved in the contract he made an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lake v. Atlantic WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Pullman Palace Car Co. v. LaackIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Stone v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- Bartram v. Town of SharonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Beatrice and Douglas Dashiell v. Keauhou-Kona CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Dias v. KamalaniHawaii Supreme Court · 1952
- Beatrice and Douglas Dashiell v. Keauhou-Kona CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Beatrice and Douglas Dashiell v. Keauhou-Kona CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973