Monto v. Gillooly
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Hatcher, Judge:
The defendant is the surviving partner of Marshall and Gillooly, contractors. They entered into an agreement with the 'State Road Commission to grade and pave with a bituminous macadam surface 6.8 miles of a state road, identified as State Project No. 3325, Barbour county. They then sublet to plaintiff the quarrying of all the stone for the napped stone base course of the project, the fine grading and the construction of the base course, to the satisfaction of the Road Commission. The plaintiff was to receive $1.00 per cubic .yard for quarrying the stone, and a like sum for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AdamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Stuart v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Davies v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Vaughan Construction Co. v. Virginian Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
- T. Towles & Co. v. County Court of Summers CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bischoff v. FrancesaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
- Sweeney Co. v. Engineers-Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Sweeney Company Of Maryland v. Engineers-Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987