Legal Opinion
Arastra Limited Partnership v. City of Palo Alto
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 15, 1975No. C-72-2305 RHSPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
SCHNACKE, District Judge.
THE NATURE OF THE CASE
This is an action by Arastra Limited Partnership, a California limited partnership (“Plaintiff”) against the City of Palo Alto (“Defendant”), for inverse condemnation of Plaintiff’s real property by Defendant’s actions over a period of time, culminating in Defendant’s passage of Municipal Ordinances Nos. 2654 and 2671.
Plaintiff, in its First Amended Complaint for Inverse Condemnation, alleges that Defendant’s Ordinance No. 2671 applying the City’s Open Space Zoning District Regulations to its property, was the final act in bad faith of…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Eldridge v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Dale v. City of Mountain ViewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Ohland v. City of MontpelierDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1979
- Frisco Land & Mining Co. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Barbaccia v. County of Santa ClaraDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.