State v. Otto
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Wayne Otto appeals after the district court denied his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a warrantless search of a camper and he entered a conditional plea of guilty. We affirm the judgment, concluding the camper falls within the scope of the automobile exception to the warrant requirement, justifying the warrantless search because law enforcement had probable cause to believe drugs were present in the vehicle.
I
[¶ 2] Bismarck Police Officer Scarlet Vetter testified she has been working for the Bismarck Police Department for three years, and while on patrol…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- California v. CarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Maryland v. DysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Pennsylvania v. LabronSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Fargo v. HoferNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. SargentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- Rasmussen v. HarveyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Rasmussen v. HarveyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- State of Tennessee v. Tommy Kaye ThompsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.