Legal Opinion
Peacock & Peacock, Inc. v. Stuyvesant Insurance Company
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 8, 1964No. 17355_1PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKMUN, Circuit Judge.
In this diversity case, removed from state court, Peacock & Peacock, Inc., claims coverage for a March 1961 poultry loss under a policy issued by Stuyvesant Insurance Company to General Mills, Inc. The case was tried to the court. Judgment in favor of the defendant was entered.
Many of the facts are stipulated. Peacock was engaged in the production and marketing of eggs and raised its own layers. General Mills was in the business of selling poultry feed and supplies. It distributed its products through dealers and by sales direct to producers. Much of this portion of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Mitchell v. MaurerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Missouri State Life Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of Tenn. v. McCraySupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Rose M. Clark v. National Travelers Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Simon Zunamon v. W. G. Brown, J. P. Brown, Sr., and J. E. (Doc) BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Graham v. HenegarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Hatridge v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Michael-Regan Co. v. LindellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.