Legal Opinion
James Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Sinensky
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdward G. Baker, J.
Plaintiff, a manufacturer of knit goods, brings this action to enjoin and restrain defendant union from picketing plaintiff’s premises, and for damages.
In or about August, 1954, Local 1499, Retail Clerks International Assn., A.F.L., was certified by the National Labor Relations Board as the exclusive bargaining representative of plaintiff’s employees. Thereafter, plaintiff entered into a collective bargaining agreement with said union, which, by its terms, was to expire on August 31, 1956. In May, 1956, one Treitler, a representative of Local 1499, and one De Leo, a representative of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Allen-Bradley Local No. 1111 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Weber v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- International Union, U. A. W. A., A. F. of L., Local 232 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Goodwins, Inc. v. HagedornNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- B. C. Manufacturing Co. v. ReiffNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Modern Transfer Co. v. Inland Terminal Workers Union, Local 1730New York Supreme Court · 1958
- Planet Wood Products Corp. v. DoeNew York Supreme Court · 1958