Legal Opinion

Miller v. Lawrence Robinson Trucking

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 23, 1998No. 2905PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURETON, Judge:

In this admitted death case, the survivors of Edward Miller sought benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Act against both Robinson Trucking Company, the subeontractor/employer, and Sealand Services, Inc., the primary contractor. As Robinson Trucking did not have compensation coverage, the Workers’ Compensation Uninsured Employers’ Fund was added as a party. The hearing commissioner found the primary contractor and its carrier, Reliance National Indemnity Co., solely liable for payment of all benefits. The contractor and its carrier appealed, arguing the Workers’ Compensation…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Whitner v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Marchbanks v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  4. McDowell v. Stilley Plywood Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  5. Adams v. Davison-Paxon Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Original Blue Ribbon Taxi Corp. v. South Carolina Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  2. Hardee v. McDowellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  3. Stewart v. Charleston County School DistrictCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API