Legal Opinion

D. M. Osborne & Co. v. Hubbard

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Jackson county: L. R. Webster, Judge. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.

— The plaintiff brought his action upon the following instrument:

“$90.00. May 12,1884.
“On or before the first day of October, 1884, for value received, I, or we, or either of us, promise to pay to the order D. M. Osborne & Co. the sum of ninety dollars, in U. S. gold coin, at the office of-, in-, with interest in like gold coin [at] ten per cent per annum from September 1st until paid; and in case suit is instituted to collect this note or any portion thereof, I, or we, or either of us, promise to pay with reasonable dollars as attorney’s fees in such suit.
“P. 0. Willow Springs, Or. C. 0.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. JordhalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Muse v. DantzlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  3. Barr v. MitchellOregon Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lumbermen's Nat. Bank v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Title & Trust Co. v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Commercial Service Corp. v. StrattonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Carklin v. GrigsbyDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API