Legal Opinion

Carklin v. Grigsby

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided September 24, 1938No. 1991-KAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ALEXANDER, District Judge.

This is a suit for the foreclosure of a real estate mortgage in defense to which the defendant Flower has plead the six-year Statute of Limitations. The questions before the court for determination are, 1: Is the mortgage in question a sealed instrument; and 2d: Does the six-year Statute or the ten-year Statute of Limitations apply thereto.

The facts in this case are briefly, as follows: On October 28, 1927, George B. Grigsby executed his promissory note, secured by a real estate mortgage, on certain real property then owned by him, to John Carklin, which mortgage was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. LinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  2. Anderson v. BaxterOregon Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Langley v. OwensSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  4. Echols v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  5. Burnette v. YoungSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dworkin v. First National Bank of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API