Legal Opinion

Judith Cunningham v. M&T Bank Corp

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 19, 2016No. 15-1412PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

Judith Cunningham, Frederick Deimler III, and Carol Vanover (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) claim to represent a nationwide class of homeowners who were victims of a captive reinsurance scheme perpetrated by M & T Bank Corporation, M & T Bank, and M & T Mortgage Reinsurance Company (collectively, “M & T”). Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit several years after the applicable statute of limitations had expired. After allowing discovery related to the timeliness of Plaintiffs’ claims, the District Court granted summary judgment for M & T. As the Court explained,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Dean Hedges v. United States of America Environmental Moorings InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  4. Sherry J. Oshiver v. Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & BermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Mary Edmondson v. Eagle National BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  2. Christopher Blake v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  3. Blake v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. James v. Acre Mortg. & Fin., Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2018
  5. Bezek v. First Mariner BankDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API