Wiley v. Bondy
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City, of New York, borough of Manhattan, for the third district, rendered in favor of . the defendants after a trial before the justice of said court,' without a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.
In September, 1897, the plaintiffs ó occupied, for business purposes, the basement and first floor of the premises No. 53 East Teúth .street, in this city. The defendants occupied, and were in possession and control, as tenants, of the second floor of said premises, which included a room in which was a bath, with two. faucets opening into the same-. The defendants also occupied *659the second floor of an ¡adjoining building, communicating with the second floor, above mentioned, by means of a door. This adjoining building was not the property of the landlord from whom the Tenth street premises…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jones v. Union Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Greco v. BernheimerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
3Cited by3 opinions
- Atkinson v. United Railroads of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Hunter v. Ricke Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Pearson v. EhrichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912