Legal Opinion

Wilmington Shipping Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 30, 1951No. 55946; protest 148378-K (Wilmington)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Lawrence, Judge:

The plaintiff herein imported from.Canada a spare propeller and a tailshaft for use as spare parts on the M. V. Maruba which was laid up for repairs at the port of Wilmington, N. C.

Upon arrival of the merchandise, the importation was classified by the collector of customs as articles or wares not specially provided for, composed wholly or in chief value of base metal, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 397), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802), and duty was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. United States v. SickelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. A. Johnson & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API