Legal Opinion
United States v. Bill E. Wolf
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 27, 1981No. 79-1773PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Chief Judge.
Appellant Wolf seeks review of his convictions for making a false statement in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001, and for mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1341.
On appeal he urges reversal based on insufficiency of the evidence to show his control of the acts charged, and further asserts that section 1001 is inapplicable because he did not make a false statement “in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States.”
Appellant Wolf was vice-president of Pioneer Energy Corporation, a distributor of oil and related products, and controlled the corporation.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. Bobbie Stanford, Louis Watson, Janice Davis, Estella Patterson, Doris Beverly, Dorothy Fife, Richard O'rourke, and Dorothy JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Leo C. Gonzales v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- United States v. Lourice Baker and Lena Marie KnowltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. J. Philippe Laferriere and Frederic J. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. St. Michael's Credit Union and Janice SacharczykCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- United States v. W. Darrell Zang and Louis PorterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Jerry OrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Larry Gibson, D/B/A Reid & Gibson TexacoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. FacchiniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.