Legal Opinion

Emerson Electric Co. v. Forrest

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1976PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOPER, Justice.

Emerson Electric Company has appealed from a decree of the Chancery Court of Henry County awarding Johnny Clayton Forrest benefits called for under the Workmen’s Compensation Act where the employee sustains one hundred percent permanent disability to the right arm. Appellant insists that appellee should be denied benefits due to his refusal to undergo further medical treatment. Appellant also insists it is not liable for payment of medical bills incurred by appellee in seeking medical help from physicians other than those selected by appellant.

There is no dispute as to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kingsport Silk Mills v. CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  2. PROCTER & GAMBLE DEFENSE CORPORATION v. WestTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Russell v. Virginia Bridge & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Rice Bottling Company v. HumphreysTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Sullivan v. GreenTennessee Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. Mission Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Harris v. Kroger Co., Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Deborah L. Bain v. UTI Integrated Logistics LLCTennessee Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API