Legal Opinion

In Re the Probate of the Will of Whipple

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1945PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

It was within the power of the Appellate Division, in the exercise of its discretion, to reverse the decree of the Surrogate upon the ground that, in its opinion, the verdict was contrary to and against the clear weight of the evidence. The Appellate Division was without power, however, to direct a contrary verdict in view of the fact that the evidence was not wholly insufficient in point of law to sustain the jury’s verdict. (See Blum v. Fresh Grown Preserve Cory., 292 N. Y. 241, 245-246.)

The order of the Appellate Division and the decree of the Surrogate’s Court should be reversed and a new…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Blum v. Fresh Grown Preserve Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of HortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
  2. In re the Probate of the Will of WhippleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  3. Lewis v. StevensonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API