Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Probate of the Will of Horton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 12, 1947Published

1DissentBrewster, J.

I dissent. The power to direct a verdict in a contested probate proceeding is no greater than in a law case. “ The procedure on trial by jury in the Surrogate’s Court has been assimilated to the procedure on jury trials generally.” (Matter of Burnham, 234 N. Y. 475, 477-478; see, also, Hagan v. 8one, 174 N. Y. 317, 323; Matter of Whipple, 294 N. Y. 292.)

To uphold the order and decree appealed from, we must, therefore, hold that the evidence presented by the contestants, (1) , to refute appellant’s proof of testamentary capacity and, (2) , to establish objections based on fraud and undue…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blum v. Fresh Grown Preserve Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. McDonald v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Matter of CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. In Re the Probate of the Will of BurnhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Hagan v. . SoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API