Legal Opinion

Fontenot v. Haight

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 1988No. 87CA0447PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BABCOCK, Judge.

Betty Fontenot (Fontenot) appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of Western Guaranty Fund (the Fund) on her traverse of answers to two of three writs of garnishment that, if granted, would have required the Fund to pay Fontenot $50,000 on each of the three writs. We affirm.

George E. Haight (Haight) was an employee of Modular Vehicle, Inc., acting in the scope of his employment when the vehicle he was driving collided with Fonte-not’s car, injuring her. In Fontenot’s negligence action, a jury verdict was entered against Haight, based on his negligence, and against Modular…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. HelmeArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Joanna Garmany, by and Through Her Next Friends v. Mission Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. UekiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  4. Blew v. Brind LeasingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Oglesby v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Colorado Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. MenorColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Cooper v. HuddyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Riddle v. Eugene Lodge No. 357 of the Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks of the United StatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. Barr v. Colorado Insurance Guaranty Ass'n & Western Guaranty Fund ServicesColorado Court of Appeals · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API