Legal Opinion

Wheaton v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 2003No. 01-6PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Chief Justice.

[T1] Appellant, William Wheaton (Whea-ton), appeals from the judgment and sentence finding him guilty of causing bodily injury to a peace officer engaged in the lawful performance of his duties, and property destruction. Wheaton contends that the State engaged in misconduct when it utilized the results of a blood alcohol test which was accomplished without his consent, and that the blood test was the result of an unreasonable search and seizure. Wheaton also asserts that his arrest was unlawful and that the district court erred in instructing the Jury.

[T2] We will affirm.

IS…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Best v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Bouwkamp v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Keser v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Blakely v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Granzer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Three Way, Inc. v. Burton Enterprises, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Butz v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Harlow v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Lapp v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API