Legal Opinion
Claridge v. New Mexico State Racing Commission
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided June 22, 1988No. 10,646, 10,633 and 10,647PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
This appeal involves the resolution of conflicting decisions of two different district courts concerning similar issues. In Hill, et al. v. New Mexico State Racing Comm’n, No. 10,633, the district court of Valencia County issued a preliminary injunction restraining the New Mexico State Racing Commission (Commission) from using, for evidentiary purposes, the results of racehorse drug tests conducted in laboratories located outside the State of New Mexico or tests which were conducted retroactively after the state racing chemist had certified that initial tests were free…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Methola v. County of EddyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Newsome v. AlaridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Duke City Lumber Co. v. New Mexico Environmental Improvement BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- DeGroot v. Arizona Racing CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Helman v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Security Escrow Corp. v. State of Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Keizor v. Sand Springs Railway Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
- State v. PetersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Lozano v. GTE Lenkurt, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.