Legal Opinion

United States v. Mullen & Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 18, 1991No. 91-10682-YPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

YOUNG, District Judge.

This action arises out of the attempt by the National Credit Union Administration (“Administration”) to enforce an administrative subpoena against Mullen & Co. (“Mullen”), an accounting firm. The targets of the Administration’s investigation have been permitted to intervene to assert an attorney-client privilege in certain of the documents on the ground that two out of the three accountants who worked on the affairs of the target individuals are attorneys who provided “legal financial” advice. Mullen stands ready to comply with the Court’s order.

It is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Couch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  4. United States v. Arthur Young & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. ColtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces TecumCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. City of Worcester v. HCA Management Co., Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
  3. Speaker Ex Rel. Speaker v. COUNTY, SAN BERNARDINODistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000
  4. Cavallaro v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
  5. State of Minnesota v. Jerry Expose, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API