Legal Opinion

Odlin v. Stuckey

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 25, 1918PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Writ of Error to Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, F. M. Robles, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

The Defendants in Error brought an action in the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County against the Plaintiff in Error upon the promissory note of the latter in favor of the former for the sum of twelve hun'ddred and sixty dollars, payable on demand.

The declaration alleged that the note bore eight per cent interest per annum and contained a promise to pay reasonable attorneys fees in the event it became necessary to collect the note through an attorney.

The Plaintiff in Error interposed the following plea:

“For a first amended plea' defendant says that, prior to the making of said promissory…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Benedict Pineapple Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. Hartford Fire Insurance v. HollisSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  3. Franklin Phosphate Co. v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  4. Heathcote v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1910
  5. Stephens v. BradleySupreme Court of Florida · 1888

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Realty Bond & Share Co. v. EnglarSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  2. Harper v. BronsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Tharp v. Kitchell Tharp v. HiscockSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  4. Barcus v. WoodSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  5. Klemtner v. PetersSupreme Court of Florida · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API