Legal Opinion

Zinkerman v. Taft Stores

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 22, 1954PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

30 N.J. Super. 322 (1954)

104 A.2d 617

FRANK E. ZINKERMAN, TRADING AS FAIR BURGLAR ALARM SYSTEM, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

TAFT STORES, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 5, 1954.

Decided April 22, 1954.

Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and CLAPP.

Mr. Simon J. Griffinger argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Louis J. Pantages argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Cox & Walburg, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.

In undertaking the consideration of the present appeal it is imperative initially…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Winberry v. SalisburySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. Goldman v. ShapiroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  3. HOPPER'S, INC. v. Red Bank Airport, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  4. State v. GoldbergNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  5. Bancroft Realty Co. v. AlencewiczNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Infante v. GottesmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API