Legal Opinion
United States v. James Lee Hinton and Arthur Dixson
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 8, 1982No. 81-2206, 81-2207PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELL, Circuit Judge.
The appellants, Arthur Dixson and James Lee Hinton, were found guilty by a jury of violating 18 U.S.C; § 201(c)(1) and (2) by soliciting money in exchange for the award of housing rehabilitation contracts funded under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, 42 U.S.C. §§ 5301-5320 (Supp. Ill 1979) (the Act). Dixson and Hinton were, respectively, the Executive Director and Housing Rehabilitation Coordinator of a community-based, non-profit corporation called United Neighborhoods, Inc. (UNI). Pursuant to the Act, UNI had entered into a contract with the city of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. William Del Toro and William KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Anthony LoschiavoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Jerry MosleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Sadik Xheka and Beha XhekaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Sam R. Rovetuso, Tommy Hendrix and Juan WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Glenn WellmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Albert Louis Lipscomb, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.