Legal Opinion

Trainer v. Porter

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1870PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Petition for ivrit of prohibition. I. Mandamus will not lie to compel an inferior tribunal to give a particular judgment, or to reverse a decision where it has once acted. (State ex rel.

Read the full summary

Petition for ivrit of prohibition. I. Mandamus will not lie to compel an inferior tribunal to give a particular judgment, or to reverse a decision where it has once acted. (State ex rel. Adamson v. Lafayette County Court, 41 Mo. 224-5; ex parte Jesse Hoyt, 13 Pet., Sup. 0. U. S., 289-90 ; Ex parte Myra Clark Whitney, 13 Pet. 407-8 ; Ex parte Taylor, 14 How., U. S., 12-13 ; Ex parte Koon, 1 Denio, 645-6 ; Elkins v. Athearn, 2 Denio, 192-3 ; The People v. The Judges of Dutchess Common Pleas, 20 Wend. 659 ; Chase v’. Blackstone Canal Co., 2 Pick. 244.)- Ilf The functions of the County Court…

1Opinion of the CourtCurrier, Judge

This is an application for a writ of prohibition forbidding the further entertainment or prosecution of the proceedings therein described.

The petition shows that one Talbott, late of said Montgomery county, died seized of a large amount of real estate, situated in that county, and that his personal assets were insufficient to pay his debts; that one Pittman was appointed by the County Court of Montgomery county to administer upon said Talbott’s estate; that said Pitman, subsequent to his appointment, and in all respects in due conformity to law, advertised and sold at public vendue certain of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Adamson v. Lafayette County CourtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
  2. Ex parte SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  3. State ex rel. West v. Justices of the County CourtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
  4. Thomas v. MeadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  5. Howard v. PierceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hamilton v. GuinotteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  2. State ex rel. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. SeayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. State ex rel. Bowling Green Trust Co. v. BarnettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  4. Clark v. De GraffenreidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. State Ex Rel. Priest v. CalhounMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API