Legal Opinion

Town of Kearny v. Discount City of Old Bridge, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 17, 2011No. A-76 September Term 2009Published

LaVecchia, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Rivera-Soto and Stern (temporarily assigned), JJ., joined.

1Opinion of the Court 1

16 A.3d 300 (2011)

205 N.J. 386

TOWN OF KEARNY, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

DISCOUNT CITY OF OLD BRIDGE, INC., Spartech Polycom, Franklin Plastics Corp., Defendants, and

DVL Kearny Holdings, LLC, Defendant-Respondent, and

James Farm Market Corp. and James Wholesale Warehouse, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

A-76 September Term 2009.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 28, 2010.

Decided March 17, 2011.

Edward Sun Kiel, Hackensack, argued the cause for appellants (Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, attorneys).

Gregory J. Castano, Jr., West Caldwell, argued the cause for respondent Town of Kearny…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Long; Dissent.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. State v. RobertiOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc. v. Middletown Donut Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Maxey v. Redevelopment Authority of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Gallenthin Realty Development, Inc. v. Borough of PaulsboroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  5. Kutzin v. PirnieSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API