Legal Opinion

Ravani v. Vaught

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 16, 2007No. 05-06-00855-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice BRIDGES.

In two issues, appellant contends the trial court erred in granting appellees’ motions for directed verdict on appellant’s negligence and negligent entrustment claims arising out of an automobile collision. We affirm.

Background

On February 2, 2004, appellant was traveling west on Interstate 635 when he was involved in a three-car accident. Hung Quoc Vu, who was also involved in the accident, sued both appellant and ap-pellees, alleging James Vaught collided with Vu’s vehicle after taking evasive measures to avoid appellant’s vehicle that had crossed into…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v. MayesTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Financial Review Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Southwest Key Program, Inc. v. Gil-PerezTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Garza v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. AmWins Specialty Auto, Inc. v. Eduardo Cabral, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2019
  2. in Re: Gustavo Buentello, M.D., Daniel Buentello, R.N.D.C., and PA Rehab Management, LLC., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API