Legal Opinion

People v. Watson

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 1961No. Crim. 7544PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, defendant Prank G. Watson appeals from the judgment. He did not testify or call any witnesses in defense. The main argument of his present counsel is that the corpus delicti was not proved without the aid of defendant’s own admissions and hence the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict.

The prosecutor and the court carefully adhered to the rule that prima facie proof of the corpus delicti should be made before receiving evidence of any confession or admission of the defendant. In examining sufficiency of the…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. HillmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. People v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. People v. CullenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. People v. AlcaldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. People v. KroegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. People v. BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Smith v. SliferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Smith v. SliferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API