Peters v. Hockley
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
The action grew ont of a collision between two automobiles at an intersection at East Thirty-eighth and Knott streets in the city of Portland. On February 17, 1934, at about 10 o ’clock p. m., plaintiff, the owner of one of the automobiles which was driven by her husband, was going south on East Thirty-eighth street, approaching Knott street, and the Hockley automobile, owned by C. C. Hockley and driven by C. C. Hockley, Jr., was going east on Knott street, approaching East Thirty-eighth street. Therefore the Hockley automobile was to the Peters’ right.
The law in effect at the time gave the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Wemett v. MountOregon Supreme Court · 1930
- Hatfield v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Patterson v. HoweOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Stryker v. HastieOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Willis v. City of BrowningMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wilson v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. WestonOregon Supreme Court · 1936
- Absher v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Hendricks v. SanfordOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Lampa v. HakolaOregon Supreme Court · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.