Legal Opinion

Peters v. Hockley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1935PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

The action grew ont of a collision between two automobiles at an intersection at East Thirty-eighth and Knott streets in the city of Portland. On February 17, 1934, at about 10 o ’clock p. m., plaintiff, the owner of one of the automobiles which was driven by her husband, was going south on East Thirty-eighth street, approaching Knott street, and the Hockley automobile, owned by C. C. Hockley and driven by C. C. Hockley, Jr., was going east on Knott street, approaching East Thirty-eighth street. Therefore the Hockley automobile was to the Peters’ right.

The law in effect at the time gave the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wemett v. MountOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Hatfield v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  3. Patterson v. HoweOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Stryker v. HastieOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Willis v. City of BrowningMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. WestonOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Absher v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. Hendricks v. SanfordOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Lampa v. HakolaOregon Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API