Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Wilke v. Newton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1932No. 23439PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant herein being in default of answer or demurrer to relators’ petition for mandamus, a peremptory mandamus is hereby allowed against the defendant.

It is ordered that the defendant immediately on service of this order permit the relators, Frank E. Wilke and Silas J. Blair, to act as attorneys for plaintiff in that certain action docketed in the court of common pleas of Portage county, Ohio, as civil case No. 12966 entitled “The Union Trust Company, a corporation, plaintiff, vs. Schustrich et al., defendants,” without requiring said relators then to be accompanied by or associated…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Meyer v. BrinskyOhio Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API