Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Brinsky

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1935No. 25069PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

The single question here presented is whether a Court of Common Pleas is empowered to establish a rule requiring the employment of local co-counsel by counsel actually of record but not maintaining an office in that county.

It is of course fundamental that courts are vested with inherent power to establish rules for regulating their proceedings and for facilitating the administra tion of justice. 7 Buling Case Law, 1023. 11 Ohio Jurisprudence, 756. This power exists independently of statute, and its exercise is especially to be commended at this time when the constantly increasing volume of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Wilke v. NewtonOhio Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cassidy v. GlossipOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Letaw v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  3. Brown v. MossopOhio Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Glimcher v. DoppeltOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Repp v. HortonOhio Court of Appeals · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API