Lacik v. Colorado, T. & M. Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Greer County; C. P. Irwin, Judge. Proceedings by the Colorado, Texas & Mexico Kailway Company and others against' C. Laeik and others. From a judgment, Laeik and others bring error. Citing: Denielt v. Leonard, 19 How. Prac. (N. Y.) 182; Rogers v. Hoskins. 14 Ga. 166; Colo. Fuel & Iron.Co. v. Railway Co. (Colo.) 66 Pac. 902; Ald-redge v. School Disi., 10 Olda. 694.
1Opinion of the CourtWilltaMs, J.
Section 3041 (chapter 18, art. 9, § 112) Wilson’s Rev. & Ann. St. 1903, provides for the condemnation of real property for railway right of way purposes, “after ten days’ notice to the opposite party, either by personal service or by leaving a copy thereof at his usual place of residence or in case of his nonresidence in the territory, by such publication in a newspaper as the judge may order.” In the case at bar, the pretended notice, served by the sheriff, neither purported to be signed by the railroad company, nor any of its officers, agents, or attorneys as such. The sole question to be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Colorado Fuel & Iron Co. v. Four Mile Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1901
- Eaton v. Supervisors of Manitowoc CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Aldredge v. School District No. 16Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
- Rogers v. HoskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
3Cited by6 opinions
- Oklahoma City v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Coyle v. Board of Com'rs of Kay CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Oklahoma City v. LockertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Bruner v. Ft. Smith W. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.