Legal Opinion

Eaton v. Supervisors of Manitowoc County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1877PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Mamtowoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtEyaN, C. J.

The notice of appeal in this case is not signed by the appellant or any one for him. Sec. 3 of ch. 264 of 1860 requires an appeal to be made by service of notice in writing; not specifying, but certainly implying, that the notice should be signed by or for the appellant. "We are not prepared to say that, when a written notice is required to be given by a party under a statute or rule not expressly direct*318ing it to be signed, and when the party himself serves the notice unsigned, the absence of signature may not be cured by the service in person. In this case, however, the record does not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Clark v. Fox & Wisconsin Improvement Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Webster v. StaddenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In re Organization & of the Bonds of the Central Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Minard v. Douglas CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Doerr ex rel. Rowan v. Southwestern Mutual Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  4. Eldridge v. KnightNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Evangelical Lutheran St. Peter's Gemeinde v. KoehlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API