Legal Opinion

Peters v. Wallace

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 13, 1927No. 17367PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REID, C.

This is an action in replevin commenced by the plaintiff to recover possession of certain personal property, wherein he alleged in his petition that he had a special ownership. Neither the petition nor the affidavit in the action states the facts constituting such special ownership, but the case appears to have been tried by the parties upon the theory that the defendant had executed and delivered to the plaintiff a mortgage on the property described in the plaintiff’s affidavit for replevin.

The record discloses that the defendant pleaded payment of the note secured -by the mortgage,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holland Banking Co. v. DicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Norman v. LambertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Skelly Oil Co. v. Globe Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Collins v. WaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Morrison v. MasseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Moore v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Nolan v. MathisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Pine v. BradleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Nunn v. SpearsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Patzkowsky v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Board of AgricultureCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API