United States v. Rodriguez
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEVAL, Circuit Judge:
This appeal raises questions about the Government’s obligations in a criminal case to make notes of, and to disclose, information that may impeach its witnesses or exculpate the defendant. Ramiro Rodriguez was convicted of drug dealing in a multi-defendant trial in which the Government’s case rested primarily on the testimony of two cooperating witnesses. During the direct examination of one cooperating witness, the Government elicited that the witness had lied “about everything” during her initial interviews with investigators. Defense counsel demanded that the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- People v. HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- ALONZO R. VAUGHN and CARL S. MORTON v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- United States v. Francisco Colorado CessaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. RittwegerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- George Clark v. Anthony AbdallahCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.