Legal Opinion

Walter Brooks Bradley, Inc. v. N. H. Yates & Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 20, 1958No. [No. 47, September Term, 1958.]PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

The plaintiff below appeals from a summary judgment for the defendant in a suit to recover damages that came about when water leaked through pipes in the radiant heating system defendant had recommended for the building of the plaintiff.

The second amended declaration alleges that in 1952 the plaintiff, a corporation engaged in business as an undertaker, had constructed a casket display building adjacent to its funeral home; that it wished a dust free heating system; that it had called on the defendant, N. H. Yates & Co., Inc., which was the Baltimore area distributor for the Bundy Tubing…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Feeney & Sheehan Building Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Holler v. LoweryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  3. Sanders v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. State Ex Rel. Chenoweth v. Baltimore Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  5. Person v. Cauldwell-Wingate Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Aravanis v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  2. Myers v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. Betesh v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974
  4. Sears v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  5. Aleshire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API