Legal Opinion

United States v. Edward J. Wilson, Frank Lorenz, and Gordon Miller, Doing Business as Ludlow Marine Basin

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 3, 1956No. 23818_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HINCKS, Circuit Judge.

This is an action brought by the United States to compel the defendants to remove a stmken barge from the Hudson River at Verplanck, New York. The defendants in succession each owned the barge at one time. The suit was brought under the Rivers and Harbors Acts of 1890 1 and 1899. 2

Judge Clancy found that the defendant Wilson owned the barge at the time when it sank in 1938; that Wilson sold to the defendant Lorenz who in turn sold to the defendant Miller and that as early as 1940 the Government had knowledge of the location and condition of the sunken barge. Holding that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Eastern Transp. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1952
  2. United States v. Wishkah Boom Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Moran Towing & Transportation Company, Incorporated, United States of America v. Bethlehem Steel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  2. United States v. Cargill, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  3. United States v. M. H. BiganCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  4. United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  5. United States v. BiganDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1959

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API